Book Review: “My Autobiography,” by Charles Chaplin

The recent release of Salinger draws attention to a historical figure not widely associated with the eponymous author: Charlie Chaplin.

The film advances the theory that the author never fully recovered from the heartbreak of having Oona O’Neill (daughter of playwright Eugene O’Neill) choose Chaplin over him. The following text is excerpted from a review  that was first published in Films in Review magazine in December, 1964. Highlights from the Salinger Q&A can be found here.

***

Chaplin’s Autobiography: Is Disappointing and Defective As Film History And Mediocre As Literature
By Jack Spears

It is noteworthy that My Autobiography is by Charles, not Charlie Chaplin.

Although Mr. Chaplin is currently a different person from the Charlie who first made movie audiences laugh and cry half a century ago, he is still unable to tell the truth about his parents and childhood, and about his strange ambivalence toward Communism.

“The Chaplin who comes through in these pages seems to me a cold and essentially self-centered man”

My Autobiography has to be read by all who are interested in the movies, but it is far from the contribution to film history it should have been, or that Chaplin could have made it had he so desired. And it is not likely to be read rewardingly by the general public, for, judged as a literary production, it is a casual and even lazy piece of work, and bears many evidences of having been dictated by a man who either doesn’t know himself or is unwilling to reveal the man he knows himself to be.

The Chaplin who comes through in these pages seems to me a cold and essentially self-centered man, and not a pleasant character in many respects. He arouses sympathy only in the passages dealing with his insane mother, yet even of her he says unkind things, and there is a faint note of resentment because she failed him as a parent. Chaplin’s attempt to explain his conduct — social, moral and political — as the end-product of childhood hardships is, by now, an old refrain.

…And he has really very little to say about his present wife, Oona, and their children. He says he never met Eugene O’Neill, which may be true, though Chaplin was a frequent visitor to the Provincetown Playhouse when The Emperor Jones was in rehearsal. I have heard that the playwright would not speak to Oona after her marriage to Chaplin, and that his anti-Chaplin feeling is supposed to have been connected with Ralph Barton, who was Carlotta Monterey’s first husband, and Chaplin’s friend.

National Board of Review Announces 2014 Gala Date

The National Board of Review Annual Awards Gala is set for Tuesday, January 7, 2014 at Cipriani 42nd Street

New York, NY (April 22, 2013) – The National Board of Review announced today that their annual awards gala will be held on Tuesday, January 7, 2014, at Cipriani 42nd Street in New York City.

“There are so many exciting films being released this year by both established and up-and-coming filmmakers,” said NBR President Annie Schulhof. “From the biggest blockbuster to the most intimate independent film, we can’t wait to watch these diverse stories unfold and to share and celebrate these experiences together during our awards gala at Cipriani.”

The National Board of Review’s annual awards gala honors and celebrates the year’s best achievements in filmmaking with categories that include Best Picture, Best Director, Best Performances, Best Ensemble, Breakthrough Performance and Spotlight award as well as signature awards such as the William K. Everson Award for Film History, Freedom of Expression and Special Achievement in Filmmaking awards.

For over 104 years the National Board of Review has dedicated its efforts to the support of domestic and foreign cinema as both art and entertainment. Each year, over 250 films (studio, independent, foreign-language, animated and documentary) are viewed by this select group of film enthusiasts, filmmakers, professionals, academics and students. These screenings are frequently followed by in-depth discussions with directors, actors, producers, and screenwriters. One of the NBR’s core values is their belief in nurturing new and up-and-coming filmmakers by awarding grants to promising film students and facilitating community outreach to The Children’s Aid Society, The Ghetto Film School, Reel Works Teen Filmmaking, and Educational Video Center.

###

Contact:
PMK*BNC
Maggie Kaatz
(212) 373-6146
Maggie.Kaatz@pmkbnc.com

George Nicholis
(212) 373-6113
George.Nicholis@pmkbnc.com

Lee Meltzer
(212) 373-6142
Lee.Meltzer@pmkbnc.com

Q&A with Director Danny Boyle and Producer Christian Colson

Director Danny Boyle established himself as one of the most versatile filmmakers in the world long ago, finding critical and commercial success with thematically disparate stories such as Trainspotting, 28 Days Later, and Slumdog Millionaire. In fact, it could be said that the Englishman’s hallmark is an almost systematic avoidance of genre elements he has already explored in previous films.

His new film Trance, which he and Producer Christian Colson (127 Hours, Slumdog Millionaire) screened for the NBR on April 4th, is no exception. Once again collaborating with writer John Hodge (Shallow Grave, Trainspotting), Boyle tells the story of Simon (James McAvoy), an auctioneer at a high-end London firm that’s suffered a severe bump on the head and can’t remember a thing about the art heist he was (apparently) involved in executing. This does not sit well with mastermind criminal Franck (Vincent Cassel), who enlists the American hypnotherapist Elizabeth (Rosario Dawson) to aide in resurfacing Simon’s lost memories.

“I’ve always wanted to make a movie with a woman in the engine room”

Besides the mind-bending plot twists this set up gives rise to, one of the most fascinating things for Boyle was the focus on a female character. “I’ve always wanted to make a movie with a woman in the engine room,” said Boyle, referring to the way in with Dawsons’s character drives the film forward at every turn. Interestingly, the original plan called for the origins of the female character and the auction house to be reversed. “We wanted to set the film in Manhattan with a UK woman living here. She’d have no friends to call on for help,” Doyle noted. However, that became impossible due to scheduling constraints associated with Boyle’s Olympics commitment. As production progressed, though, Boyle quickly realized that they could set it in any city, because “cities are where crimes can happen and anonymity is available.”

More than anything else, Boyle “wanted to make a film for enjoyment… and this was an absolute joy to make.” Indeed, every choice in Trance (from casting, to production design, to photography) was meant to result in a sumptuous experience for the audience. From a shotgun-wielding, art-heisting, love-making Vincent Cassel to a refreshingly ruthless James McAvoy, Trance is not a subtle film, and makes no apologies for it. When every choice in a film is “designed to fill you with pleasure,” the audience need only sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.